Collaboration between English for Academic Purposes and the Disciplines

Featured Colloquia > Collaboration between English for Academic Purposes and the Disciplines


Co-hosts

Top

Participants

Top

Abstracts

Collaboration between English for Academic Purposes and the Disciplines
One of the more significant changes within higher education has been the increase in the number of students for whom English is an additional language (EAL) studying in English-medium universities around the world. Recent emphasis within teaching and learning is on learning communities, which is characterized by student participation, and where English language and disciplinary learning play a significant role. These shifts require consideration as to how the curriculum can better address the language and learning needs of EAL students. However, the issue of English language learning is usually marginalized and left to English language programs. There has been very little research dedicated to developing collaboration between English language and disciplinary academic staff. This colloquium will focus on discussing some of the complex issues involved in developing collaboration. It will draw on research from the Netherlands, Hong Kong, USA and Australia to examine critical issues around collaboration and the implications for policy and practice.

Integrating English Language and Disciplinary Teaching: Enter with Caution
by Dr Sophie Arkoudis

Dr Sophie Arkoudis will open the colloquium with an overview of issues concerning the development of collaborative practices within Australian higher education institutions. She will case study one institution’s attempt to embed language programs within disciplinary teaching and analyze the different stakeholders’ views about English language development in higher education. The paper will argue that the focus should be on discussing issues of teaching and learning within curriculum planning, with particular attention to developing English language skills required for completing the assessment tasks.

Collaboration Across the Disciplines: Insights from U.S. Community Colleges
by Prof JoAnn Crandall

This paper will draw upon extensive research with five representative community colleges in the United States, to discuss ways in which faculty in these colleges have collaborated across disciplines and with a number of other stakeholders to enable adult English language learners (ELLs) with diverse language, literacy, and educational backgrounds and goals to transition from adult ESL to academic, vocational, or workforce preparation programs, including moving from noncredit to credit EAP courses. Attempts to structure career pathways for adult ELLs will also be discussed.

"English in the Major” at HKU: A Second Turn of the Academic Literacy Wheel
by Mr Nigel Bruce
I review 15 years of collaboration by English Center (EC) teachers with faculty at the University of Hong Kong in the development and review of a range of different types of EAP programs. These typically began with close collaboration on needs analysis and source material, and settled into a comfortable delegation to the EC of responsibility for developing students’ disciplinary literacy – which for many colleagues meant improving their grammar. The impending expansion to a 4-year curriculum in 2012 has brought English back in focus, with an institutional ambition to expand attention to, and ideally responsibility for, English into the 97% of students’ curricula taught by faculty. I will address some of the problems this policy promises to revive, notably foundational and conduit constructions of the relationship between language and knowledge, and issues of trust, competence and status when language and subject teachers contemplate strategies to develop students’ academic literacies that go beyond the exclusive partitioning of labor and expertise.

The Role of an Integrated Approach to Language and Content in Promoting Student Participation in Classroom Discussion at English Medium of Instruction Universities
by Dr John Trent
Integrated language and content instruction is thought to be an effective way for both English language learners and learners of other languages to develop both their language and academic skills at the same time (Creese, 2005; Gibbons, 2002). However, researchers have reported difficulties in the establishment of collaborative partnerships between language and content teachers, difficulties which seem to go beyond practical issues such as workload, timetabling and resources to the underlying epistemological differences between language and content teachers (Arkoudis, 2000; Davison, 2006). Yet few researchers have attempted to explore how these differences are realized in the situated activity of the classroom or how these differences are shaped by broader institutional polices and practices. This paper draws on questionnaire, interview and observational data collected as part of a larger ethnographic study of Chinese-background freshmen in an English medium of instruction (EMI) university in Asia. Adopting Layder’s (1993; 2006) theory of social domain analysis, the paper begins with an examination of some of the underlying assumptions in current conceptualizations of learning in and through English among students and staff in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and Economics and Finance at the tertiary level, then explores the epistemological differences revealed by such perceptions and practices. The implications of this research for evaluating approaches to collaboration and for setting realistic goals for staff development and institutional change will also be explored.

Top